Dear Singaporean men and women:
I don't know what's wrong with the morality and ethics of modern hipster generation of young men and women such as found in Rachel Wong and virtually overwhelmingly the TENDING/INCLINING majority of the rest of the Singaporean young population!!!!!
The scene of adultery or cuckolding enacted in Rachel Wong's shockingly brazen or impudent real-time dynamic infidelity in morally shy and conservative, or, 'relatively more righteous' (compared to Western nations!) Singapore is straight out of Western and Asian porn-themed flicks and movies found in many of their degrading and degenerating websites now banned by IMDA Singapore for a good purpose!!!
I had otherwise thought in my child-like moral innocence or otherwise that lurid and indecent scenes and events such as a wedding bride being cuckolded or adulterated on wedding day/night was the exclusive reserve of the realm of artificial man-made hence corruptible pornography but Rachel Wong and her male adulterers proved me otherwise wrong!!! These men and women showed me Joe KS that the spirit of pornography or pornographic desire/urge is rather alive, kicking and totally endemic like COVID-19 in the modern irradiated and chemicalized or environmentally polluted/sullied Singaporean human population!!!!!
Eeeeeeewwwwww yucks yucks yucks yucks eeeerrrgggghhhhh, it's just insane man, like what am I reading or what kinda moral abomination am I contemplating in 2022 and whether I should be excited or outraged or both at the same time because such moral degeneracy had been perfectly portended by the Divine God and His Scripture as well as of course by the obscenely artificially polluted radiofrequency and chemical/air-particulate environment of Singapore's but especially the former!!!
Does that make sense ladies and gentlemen of Singaporean airspace?!
Haizzzzzz, oh dear oh mine, I have been sighing almost penitently daily since the demise portended of mi pequenita hijo Soh Ruiyong from January 2016 onwards and I don't forsee this sighing will ever end nor be exhausted........haizzzzzz............
But this is not the only issue I would like to raise with Rachel Wong's and her 2 male co-stars shocking infidelity that evoked the correct and appropriate equal response in defendent Olivia Wu in her statement against the Plaintiff Rachel "what kinda beast fks the bride on her wedding day"!!!!!
I love this statement for its uuuggghhhh utmost P-R-O-F-A-N-I-T-Y equal and opposite in reflecting/imaging/mirroring of Rachel's own profane-ness IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!!!
Does that make sense like this?!!!
Therefore, in everybody's minds and hearts must be affirmed the NON-DEFAMATORY content of Olivia Wu's statement, the same way I Daddy Joe KS might also not have offended on mi pequenita hijo Soh Ruiyong under Singapore's Defamation Laws if it's indeed ALMOST BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT or 99.99999% that he is Singapore's most prolific albeit hush-hush doper of all time given Sports Singapore and/or Antidoping Singapore's whistleblowing revelation as well as a host of other compatible and strongly corroborating circumstantial and other evidence or lack thereof that strengthens the case for his doping!!!
I mean dear Singaporean men and women, just ask yourselves which world-class elite distance runner in the world, just name any, is able to run 'PBs' or 'NRs' at distances from 1500m to the marathon in a single calendar year or worst single 3-4 month autumn-winter season in 2021 unless he/she must have also been doped to the gills or illegally/unfairly/immorally assisted!!!!!
Does that make sense now or what?!!!!
Oh mine, oh dear.............and to think we have Brian Pek of Singapore outwardly 'professing his love and admiration' for Soh Ruiyong by extoling the latter's 'ethics', and to have Ang Chen Xiang, Shanti Perreira, Rueben Rainer, Jeevanesh, Michelle, Vanessa, Ethan, and of course Romaine all deeply associated and connected with the same, therefore could there be any more flagrant stupidity and ignorance in the Singaporean human population than these aforementioned Singaporean men and women and those who also choose to be silent in tacit support of their immoral sins and transgressions?!!!
Haizzzz.......before I digress too far, I would like to return to what other issues I found morally abominable in Rachel Wong's case and even in her counsel Clarence Lun who against proper Christian ethics and morality (being that he is Fervent Christian!!!) not only didn't quickly volunteer and submit/dig all the Whatsapp correspondences of Rachel's without being asked by anyone on earth to do so in order to truly prove Rachel's innocence in the matter, but actually did the complete opposite by HOLDING BACK such key and relevant information DESPITE BEING HOUNDED/ORDERED/FORCED by first Olivia then 2 District Court Judges to do so!!!!!!
Under moral justice, the actions and behaviors of Clarence Lun and Rachel Wong are especially aggravating of both of their already non-existent moral virtue if they had any to start with in the first place!!!
I mean, it's simple elementary-type or basic morally correct response to RUSH TO OFFER ONE'S WHATSAPP EXCHANGES to debunk every single possible suspicion of infidelity or otherwise sexual immorality if also no such hints or tendencies would ever be found in the same, as Justice Choo had also commented similarly that 'it would strengthen the plaintiff's case if no such evidence were found', does that make sense like this?!!
Similarly, the same analogy applied to mi pequenita hijo Ruiyong's actions and behaviors would see him, if he truly weren't doping at any point in time and space, not cut holes in his singlet, not contravene blackout rule, not dispute 20% payout, not insult and distress Mok, Mark, Jed, Malik, Chuan-Jin, not demean and disparage SNOC and its officials, not become BFF with convicted doper Jordan Chipangama nor be associated with doping organization NAZ elite and Ben Rosario, not ran a shocking 14:44, 31:12, 31:28, 4:02, 6:53, 66:41, 2:24:55, 2:23:42, 2:22:59 always against the vibe and sentiment of moral virtue and ethics, and finally not spoken, behaved and acted in any other way that conveys to any right-thinking and morally sound Singaporean man and woman those suggestive of a great jinx and/or curse kinda like the son of Lucifer or otherwise!!!
Does that make sense?!!!
A righteous person or somebody of moral rectitude under my Joe KS' incomparable electrohypersensitive and multiple chemical sensitive MICROSCOPE LENS would be unassailable and consistently so both in speech and action but ESPECIALLY VIBE!!!!!!!!! Vibe pertains to 6th sensing ability, ie, metaphysical/subconscious etc.............
Rachel Wong and Clarence Lun, under Justice Choo's sharp microscope +6th sensing ability, already fail the first hurdle in the test of their moral righteousness, ie, THEY FLED LIKE FUGITIVES OR TRY TO ESCAPE the sentence or order imposed on them to reveal Whatsapp correspondence messages!!!
These 2 give off the vibe of moral perversion or injustice and the burden is stronger and heavier for Clarence Lun a lawyer supposed to swear by top-notched moral righteousness in speech, action and vibe than it is for Rachel.....
I hold nothing against Rachel nor of Clarence, but honestly their ship is sinking rapidly with such moral credentials under the laser-eyed scrutiny of Justice Choo of High Court Singapore which begs the question whether or why they should file a defamation lawsuit in the first place if they already knew, especially Rachel, that she wanted terribly to succumb to the lust of her flesh in contrast with doing so by a moment of folly or error of judgement!!!!!!
This means, based on the impudence or extent/angle/degree/texture/shade of Rachel's shocking infidelity it very well seems like she was dripping uuuugggghhh salivating and thirsting for carnal fulfilment of an abominable and wicked sort with pre-meditated intention and execution the way a porn flick is artificially staged (pre-meditated!)!!!!!
Oh oh oh mine.............gosh sorry for swearing in the name of the Lord God but this is pretty next-level Singaporean moral conservatism!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Eeeeeeewwwwww yucks yucks yucks yucks eeeerrrgggghhhhh, it's just insane man, like what am I reading or what kinda moral abomination am I contemplating in 2022 and whether I should be excited or outraged or both at the same time because such moral degeneracy had been perfectly portended by the Divine God and His Scripture as well as of course by the obscenely artificially polluted radiofrequency and chemical/air-particulate environment of Singapore's but especially the former!!!
Does that make sense ladies and gentlemen of Singaporean airspace?!
Haizzzzzz, oh dear oh mine, I have been sighing almost penitently daily since the demise portended of mi pequenita hijo Soh Ruiyong from January 2016 onwards and I don't forsee this sighing will ever end nor be exhausted........haizzzzzz............
But this is not the only issue I would like to raise with Rachel Wong's and her 2 male co-stars shocking infidelity that evoked the correct and appropriate equal response in defendent Olivia Wu in her statement against the Plaintiff Rachel "what kinda beast fks the bride on her wedding day"!!!!!
I love this statement for its uuuggghhhh utmost P-R-O-F-A-N-I-T-Y equal and opposite in reflecting/imaging/mirroring of Rachel's own profane-ness IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!!!
Does that make sense like this?!!!
Therefore, in everybody's minds and hearts must be affirmed the NON-DEFAMATORY content of Olivia Wu's statement, the same way I Daddy Joe KS might also not have offended on mi pequenita hijo Soh Ruiyong under Singapore's Defamation Laws if it's indeed ALMOST BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT or 99.99999% that he is Singapore's most prolific albeit hush-hush doper of all time given Sports Singapore and/or Antidoping Singapore's whistleblowing revelation as well as a host of other compatible and strongly corroborating circumstantial and other evidence or lack thereof that strengthens the case for his doping!!!
I mean dear Singaporean men and women, just ask yourselves which world-class elite distance runner in the world, just name any, is able to run 'PBs' or 'NRs' at distances from 1500m to the marathon in a single calendar year or worst single 3-4 month autumn-winter season in 2021 unless he/she must have also been doped to the gills or illegally/unfairly/immorally assisted!!!!!
Does that make sense now or what?!!!!
Oh mine, oh dear.............and to think we have Brian Pek of Singapore outwardly 'professing his love and admiration' for Soh Ruiyong by extoling the latter's 'ethics', and to have Ang Chen Xiang, Shanti Perreira, Rueben Rainer, Jeevanesh, Michelle, Vanessa, Ethan, and of course Romaine all deeply associated and connected with the same, therefore could there be any more flagrant stupidity and ignorance in the Singaporean human population than these aforementioned Singaporean men and women and those who also choose to be silent in tacit support of their immoral sins and transgressions?!!!
Haizzzz.......before I digress too far, I would like to return to what other issues I found morally abominable in Rachel Wong's case and even in her counsel Clarence Lun who against proper Christian ethics and morality (being that he is Fervent Christian!!!) not only didn't quickly volunteer and submit/dig all the Whatsapp correspondences of Rachel's without being asked by anyone on earth to do so in order to truly prove Rachel's innocence in the matter, but actually did the complete opposite by HOLDING BACK such key and relevant information DESPITE BEING HOUNDED/ORDERED/FORCED by first Olivia then 2 District Court Judges to do so!!!!!!
Under moral justice, the actions and behaviors of Clarence Lun and Rachel Wong are especially aggravating of both of their already non-existent moral virtue if they had any to start with in the first place!!!
I mean, it's simple elementary-type or basic morally correct response to RUSH TO OFFER ONE'S WHATSAPP EXCHANGES to debunk every single possible suspicion of infidelity or otherwise sexual immorality if also no such hints or tendencies would ever be found in the same, as Justice Choo had also commented similarly that 'it would strengthen the plaintiff's case if no such evidence were found', does that make sense like this?!!
Similarly, the same analogy applied to mi pequenita hijo Ruiyong's actions and behaviors would see him, if he truly weren't doping at any point in time and space, not cut holes in his singlet, not contravene blackout rule, not dispute 20% payout, not insult and distress Mok, Mark, Jed, Malik, Chuan-Jin, not demean and disparage SNOC and its officials, not become BFF with convicted doper Jordan Chipangama nor be associated with doping organization NAZ elite and Ben Rosario, not ran a shocking 14:44, 31:12, 31:28, 4:02, 6:53, 66:41, 2:24:55, 2:23:42, 2:22:59 always against the vibe and sentiment of moral virtue and ethics, and finally not spoken, behaved and acted in any other way that conveys to any right-thinking and morally sound Singaporean man and woman those suggestive of a great jinx and/or curse kinda like the son of Lucifer or otherwise!!!
Does that make sense?!!!
A righteous person or somebody of moral rectitude under my Joe KS' incomparable electrohypersensitive and multiple chemical sensitive MICROSCOPE LENS would be unassailable and consistently so both in speech and action but ESPECIALLY VIBE!!!!!!!!! Vibe pertains to 6th sensing ability, ie, metaphysical/subconscious etc.............
Rachel Wong and Clarence Lun, under Justice Choo's sharp microscope +6th sensing ability, already fail the first hurdle in the test of their moral righteousness, ie, THEY FLED LIKE FUGITIVES OR TRY TO ESCAPE the sentence or order imposed on them to reveal Whatsapp correspondence messages!!!
These 2 give off the vibe of moral perversion or injustice and the burden is stronger and heavier for Clarence Lun a lawyer supposed to swear by top-notched moral righteousness in speech, action and vibe than it is for Rachel.....
I hold nothing against Rachel nor of Clarence, but honestly their ship is sinking rapidly with such moral credentials under the laser-eyed scrutiny of Justice Choo of High Court Singapore which begs the question whether or why they should file a defamation lawsuit in the first place if they already knew, especially Rachel, that she wanted terribly to succumb to the lust of her flesh in contrast with doing so by a moment of folly or error of judgement!!!!!!
This means, based on the impudence or extent/angle/degree/texture/shade of Rachel's shocking infidelity it very well seems like she was dripping uuuugggghhh salivating and thirsting for carnal fulfilment of an abominable and wicked sort with pre-meditated intention and execution the way a porn flick is artificially staged (pre-meditated!)!!!!!
Oh oh oh mine.............gosh sorry for swearing in the name of the Lord God but this is pretty next-level Singaporean moral conservatism!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment